I don’t take well to insults to my character. Being called a liar? That has to be up there as one of the biggest insults to my character that someone can make. Recently Kvetcher has called me a liar, and claimed I didn’t think when he mistook my intentions in one of my posts, and now (despite his own rules) says i’m “not very bright”.
So lets go through the times that DK has written with hyperbole just like I did, but I’m the bad person.
Here DK wrote,
I think for refusing to wear tefillin, the son should be publicly whipped, his apartment “donated” to a yeshiva, his secular whore of a girlfriend dragged by a mehadrin Egged-bus around town, and just for good measure, a Modern Orthodox girl should get bleached.
He was clearly trying to mock what some crazies did to some people who weren’t keeping up with their religious standard. But by his rules we must believe he actually believes we should do those things.
Here it says,
And I am not going to shake hands with Eli anymore. Now I realize…he is just trying to cop a feel.
Well I should hope DK has not shaken Eli’s hand since that date, because then he is the liar.
On this page Kelsey posts a picture of Jim Jones who was the leader of the Jonestown cult where they killed a congressman and themselves. So his implication is that NCSY will get you to kill yourself and members of congress. I’m sure that wasn’t his point, but he “didnt think” when using someone like Jones to make a point.
In the same vein, here, Kvetcher has a picture of Stalin and actually has a tag saying that it is Rabbi Pinchas Stolper. So we are to believe that Rabbi Stolper killed millions of people, ran communist Russia, helped defeat Nazi Germany after making a deal with them, and most importantly is dead.
So, were you trying to make a point with all these examples (i have many more I just stuck with these), or did you mean for them to be taken literally? Did you think before posting them?
Fortunately, when dealing with people who hate religious people so much, you get used to the double standard.
A Comment on Commenting
January 28, 2009 — cheererFor those of you new to the commenting on “The Cheerer” let me be clear on the policies.
All comments, ESPECIALLY dissenting, ones will be accepted. Personal attacks are not. If you attack someone else personally (be it me or a fellow commentor) I reserve the right to remove your comment and put you in moderation
If it is your first time commenting you comment will remain in moderation until I approve it (this helps keep the crazies out). After you first approved comment you will be free to comment at your leisure until a violation of the rules occurs. (hear that SJ? I don’t moderate every comment till I can respond, only the first one).
Also, self promotion without adding something to the coversation is not allowed. So, comments like “Check out my latest post” or “Look at what i said here” will not be allowed unless they are being added to a comment of yours to save space, or if you prefer not to reiterate something you already said. If you are merely trying to gain readership, try adding to the conversation.